You are using an older browser version. Please use a supported version for the best MSN experience.

Health - Top Stories

Thinx Denies Claims of Toxic Chemicals in the Crotch of Its Menstrual Underwear

Flare logo Flare 2020-01-13 Madelyn Chung
a close up of a green plant: (Photo: Stocksy; Illustration: Maegan Fidelino) © Provided by Flare (Photo: Stocksy; Illustration: Maegan Fidelino)

Menstrual underwear has become more and more popular over the past few years, especially among millennials who want more environmentally friendly and safer feminine products rather than single-use products like pads and tampons, both of which have been found to have toxic chemicals linked to cancer, reproductive harm, hormone disruption and allergic reactions. (For a full list of chemicals detected in period products, check out Women’s Voices of the Earth, an American environmental organization specializing in research and advocacy regarding toxic chemicals.) Oh, and let’s not forget about toxic shock syndrome (TSS), the potentially fatal condition caused by the release of toxins from an overgrowth of bacteria that’s sometimes associated with tampon use because the blood that accumulates in a tampon can serve as a breeding ground for said bacteria.

But it turns out that not all period-proof underwear is exactly safe. According to a report published in Sierra Club’s magazine, Sierra, popular menstrual-underwear brand Thinx reportedly has toxic chemicals in the crotch of some of its products. (As if 2020 hasn’t already given us enough horrible news.)

Read this next: Should You Actually Be Freaking out About Hair Dye and Its Link to Cancer?

In the article, the story’s reporter, Jessian Choy, says she decided to mail unused Lunapads and Thinx menstrual underwear to Dr. Graham Peaslee, a nuclear scientist at the University of Notre Dame, to see if they contained toxic chemicals. Dr. Peaslee, as Choy notes, was responsible for discovering PFAS (that is, per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances) in fast-food wrappers in 2017. PFAS are a group of man-made chemicals commonly used in waterproofing and stain-resistant finishes that don’t break down and accumulate over time, both in the environment and in the human body. This means they can remain in the human body for long periods of time, which can result in adverse health effects, such as fertility issues and even cancer.

According to Dr. Peaslee’s results, Lunapads were free of PFAS but Thinx underwear—specifically the “organic” brief and “organic” BTWN Shorty underwear for teens—had high levels of PFAS, especially on the inside layers of the crotch.

View this post on Instagram

Give the gift of a Fresh Start 🙌Our @thinxbtwn Fresh Start Period Kit is the perfect present to help the teen in your life period better. Now available in two absorbencies to go with every flow, each Kit includes three of our best-selling styles in our *freshest* colors. A post shared by Thinx (@shethinx) on Dec 11, 2019 at 4:30am PST

As Choy notes, the vagina is a very absorbent and very sensitive part of the body. The permeable mucous membranes that line the vaginal tissues and protect the body from bacteria can also easily absorb chemicals without metabolizing them. So it’s safe to say that having harmful chemicals close to that area is not a great idea.

“Exposure to PFAS at even the lowest concentrations has been shown to harm human health,” Choy writes. “The crotch in my underwear had 3,264 parts per million (ppm), and the one for teens had 2,054 ppm… That’s high enough to suggest that they were intentionally manufactured with PFAS.”

Read this next: Painful Period Have a Lot to Do with Race and We Need to Talk About It

In an email response to FLARE, however, Thinx shared lab test results from its latest product-safety evaluation in September 2019 and claimed they “found no PFAS chemicals were detected.”


“Our customers’ health and safety is our number one priority, and we will always work to deliver the safest products available,” said Maria Molland, CEO of Thinx Inc, in a statement to FLARE. “All Thinx and Thinx (BTWN) underwear undergo the most stringent product safety evaluations available. While Thinx products comply with all legal safety requirements in Europe and the United States, we strive to go beyond those requirements and are constantly working to improve our products and manufacturing processes to use the safest substances and materials available.”

Molland continued, “Thinx uses both OCS-certified and GOTS-certified organic cotton, and our product safety testing is conducted to meet the robust European safety standards of REACH and OEKO-TEX, which include testing for some PFAS chemicals. Based on these third-party tests, PFAS chemicals were not detected in Thinx products.”

Molland concluded by saying that Thinx is treating these claims “with the serious that it deserves” and “working to dramatically expand the list of chemicals that we test for in our products, including unregulated PFAS chemicals, and develop a robust safer chemicals policy across our entire family of brands.”

“If any of these chemicals are found, we will move swiftly to remove them from our products,” she concluded.

Read this next: 6 Myths About the Birth Control Pill, Debunked

Following Sierra‘s report, Twitter users were quick to ask Canadian company Knix if its menstrual underwear also contained the toxic chemicals. (Note: FLARE reached out to Knix for comment, but so far has not received a response.)

According to a response posted on Knix’s Twitter account, the main difference between Knix and Thinx is that the former’s “patented technology takes place at the fiber level vs a chemical coating.”

Knix added, “Additionally, all of the fabrics in our gusset technology are OEKO-TEX certified for safety.”

FWIW, if you recall, Thinx also said its products are OEKO-TEX standard.

Knix also weighed in with its two cents on why Thinx may contain toxic chemicals: “We suspect that part of the chemical issue with Thinx is in the stain proofing technology, which is something that Knix underwear doesn’t have. We’re putting our fabric to some additional tests and we’ll have more info soon.”

This isn’t the first time Thinx has experienced controversy. Back in 2017, the firm’s former head of PR, Chelsea Leibow, filed a sexual-harassment complaint against ex-boss Miki Agrawal, the Canadian-born founder and former CEO of the brand. Though the two parties ending up settling and the complaint was withdrawn, Agrawal was ousted from her own company. (She has since gone on to found bidet-attachment company TUSHY.)

We wait with bated breath to see what happens next in this saga.


More from Flare

image beaconimage beaconimage beacon