You are using an older browser version. Please use a supported version for the best MSN experience.

Top Stories

CBI vs CBI: Supreme Court reserves verdict on Alok Verma plea

India Today logo India Today 06-12-2018 IndiaToday.in
a man wearing a suit and tie: Verma has filed a petition challenging the government's authority to send him on leave, arguing that it went against rules that mandate a two-year term in office for a CBI chief. © IndiaToday.in Verma has filed a petition challenging the government's authority to send him on leave, arguing that it went against rules that mandate a two-year term in office for a CBI chief.

The Supreme Court on Thursday reserved order on the plea of Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) director Alok Verma challenging Centre's decision to divest him of his powers. Earlier, the court observed that the director of the CBI must continue in his post for two years.

Verma, who was involved in a bitter feud with his deputy and CBI's No. 2 officer, special director Rakesh Asthana, has been sent on forced leave by the government. Both Verma and Asthana, who has been sent on leave as well, have accused each other of corruption.

Verma has filed a petition challenging the government's authority to send him on leave, arguing that it went against rules that mandate a two-year term in office for a CBI chief.

The government has argued that Verma has not been "removed" from the post but has just been sent on leave since he and Asthana were "fighting like cats".

Verma is still the CBI director, the government has argued.

Today, the government repeated the same arguments in court as it sought to a convince a Chief Justice of India Ranjan Gogoi-led bench that had to intervene and take action against Verma since there were serious charges of corruption against him.

Now get the stories that matter delivered to you! Save our number and send "Hi" to +919971254657 to join the MSN WhatsApp alerts service today.

In response, Verma's lawyer argued that the rules mandate that a CBI director must "remain in office" for two years. "It's not a nomenclature that he can call himself the Director. He must remain in office," Verma's lawyer said.

The Supreme Court observed that the director has to continue for two years. The court also asked why the government moved against Verma and Asthana overnight if the fight between them had not emerged overnight.

Earlier on Wednesday, the government told the Supreme Court that the CBI director and the special director were fighting like "kilkenny cats", exposing the country's premier investigating agency to public ridicule.

Also watch: "You tolerated fight since July, why urgent move": SC on CBI chief

Replay Video

(Video provided by NDTV)

Attorney General (AG) K K Venugopal also told the top court that the government was well "within its right to intervene" and send both officers on leave by divesting them of their powers.

The top law officer asserted that "only the God knows where and how this fight between the two top officers would have ended" if the government would not have taken the action which was aimed at restoring the public faith in the CBI.

Inputs from Aneesha Mathur and PTI

In pics: 10 bizarre laws from around the world

ALSO CHECK OUT THE TOP STORIES OF THE DAY

"Who slaughtered cows? That's the bigger question": Top UP cop's shocker

"We can only act on evidence. We need to do forensic tests. It is not clear who shot the police officer, who shot Sumit (the second man killed in mob violence)," the police officer told NDTV. Read more...

Vijay Mallya responds to his extradition "linked" to Christian Michel's

Reiterating his stand, the liquor baron tweeted this morning, appealing to banks to accept his offer to take back the principal loan amount he owes them. Read more...

BJP Dalit MP Savitri Bai Phule resigns, says ‘party creating divisions in society’

She alleged that Dalits and backwards were being called ‘bandar’ (monkey) and ‘rakshas’ (demon). Read more...


More From India Today

image beaconimage beaconimage beacon