You are using an older browser version. Please use a supported version for the best MSN experience.

Free Traders Can't Name a Single Trade War

The Huffington Post The Huffington Post 8/03/2016 Ian Fletcher
BUSINESS EURO © Paulo Buchinho via Getty Images BUSINESS EURO

Failed 2012 presidential candidate Mitt Romney has been claiming that Donald Trump's (and by logical implication, Bernie Sanders') proposed rejection of free trade would start a trade war and tip America into recession.
Economists Paul Krugman and Howard Richman have both neatly summarized why this simply isn't how the economics works, even if a trade war does happen, so I won't repeat their points here.
But I have a simpler one: Trade wars are mythical. They simply do not happen.
If you google "the trade war of," you won't find any historical examples. There was no Austro-Korean Trade War of 1638, Panamanian-Brazilian Trade War of 1953, or any others. History is devoid of them.
(Please don't respond with that old canard about the Smoot-Hawley tariff of 1930 starting a trade war and causing the Great Depression. It doesn't stand up, as actual economic historians from Milton Friedman on the right to Paul Krugman on the left have documented. See here, and here, and here.)
Trade wars are an invented concept, a bogeyman invented to push free trade.
The giveaway, of course, is that free traders claim both that a) trade wars are a terrible threat we must constantly worry about, and b) it's obvious no nation can ever gain anything from having one. Think about that for minute.
Now my challenge to free traders (and to my readers) is this: write to me and name a trade war. I promise to publish any results I get.
Note: Trade wars started for non-economic reasons in wartime, with the deliberate intention of screwing up the other side's economy, don't count. We were quite right not to be selling Germany steel in 1942.

More from Huffington Post

The Huffington Post
The Huffington Post
image beaconimage beaconimage beacon