You are using an older browser version. Please use a supported version for the best MSN experience.

Is Hillary Clinton Really Surging In Iowa?

The Huffington Post The Huffington Post 27/10/2015 Ariel Edwards-Levy
ATHENA IMAGE © Bloomberg via Getty Images ATHENA IMAGE

Hillary Clinton holds an overwhelming lead over Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders (I) in two new surveys of the Iowa caucus, results that either stand out as significant outliers or mark a dramatic surge.

Clinton leads Bernie Sanders by 41 points in Monmouth University's first survey of Iowa's Democrats. She leads by 38 points in a Loras College poll also released Tuesday, up from the 25-point lead she held in Loras' August survey.

That's a sharp departure from the three other polls conducted in Iowa this month, which show Clinton ahead of Sanders by just 3, 7 and 11 percentage points. HuffPost Pollster's average, incorporating all publicly available polls, gives Clinton about a 7-point lead over Sanders.

It's unsurprising that Clinton's numbers are on the rise. She benefited this month both from a strong debate performance and from Vice President Joe Biden's decision not to enter the presidential race, and rallied Democrats with her testimony in last week's 11-hour Benghazi hearings.

If Clinton had pulled away from Sanders to the extent shown in the latest two Iowa polls, however, she might be expected to have surged similarly in national surveys, where she's traditionally performed better. Nationally, though, she leads by a relatively modest average of 26 points, up from 19 points at the beginning of October.

Another part of the explanation may lie in the way the pollsters attempted to screen for voters who are likely to turn out for the caucus.

Unlike some other survey houses, which have relied on voters' own assessments of whether they'll participate, Monmouth surveyed only registered Democrats who both voted in at least one of Iowa's last two state primaries (which in 2014 featured uncontested Senate and gubernatorial racesand said they were likely to attend the caucuses next February.

As The New York Times' Nate Cohn noted, those requirements could knock out many first-time caucusgoers, voters who aren't affiliated with a party, or those who vote in presidential caucuses but not most primary elections. Those groups helped President Barack Obama pull a win in 2008 and are more likely to lean toward Sanders in 2016.

“I don’t feel this is 2008,” Patrick Murray, Monmouth's polling director, told The New York Times. “I don’t think we’re going to get that big number who have never participated in a primary before.”

Loras College also looked only at voters who participated in the 2012 or 2014 state primaries. It, however, included voters who weren't currently registered Democrats but had a history of voting in primaries and said they were likely to participate in next year's caucus, as well as voters who registered after December 2014. 

Monmouth surveyed 400 likely Democratic caucusgoers in Iowa between Oct. 22 and Oct. 25, while Loras surveyed 500 likely Democratic caucusgoers in Iowa between Oct. 19 and Oct. 22. Both used live interviewers to reach landlines and cell phones.

Also on HuffPost:

More from Huffington Post

The Huffington Post
The Huffington Post
image beaconimage beaconimage beacon