You are using an older browser version. Please use a supported version for the best MSN experience.

Is Snap the new Twitter?

The Atlantic logo The Atlantic 8/11/2017 Derek Thompson

Video by Money

It was supposed to be the future of social media and video. It’s looking like just another Facebook victim.

Snap was hailed as the next Facebook. It is starting to look like the next Twitter.

Alright, perhaps that’s unfair. But in its latest earnings report, Snap (formerly Snapchat, which remains the name of the company’s app) announced some awfully Twitterish news. User growth has declined and quarterly losses tripled, compared to the same period last year. The company is on pace to lose more than $1 billion in 2017 (not counting nearly $2 billion in one-time costs related to its initial public offering). After the announcement, the stock price for Snap slumped more than 10 percent, bringing it down to roughly half its post-IPO high.

What’s Snap’s problem? Basically, Facebook. One year ago, Instagram, the photo-sharing app owned by Facebook, introduced its own version of Snapchat’s “Stories.” This feature had been a critical differentiator for Snapchat, allowing its users to make and share mini-movies about their lives, and helped make the app extraordinarily popular. Since Instagram rolled out its near-perfect facsimile, though, Snapchat’s growth rate has collapsed.

There are several ways for a public company to assure investors of its value: rising profits or dividends (like Apple), rising cashflow (like Amazon), or so much growth in users that investors assume cashflow and profits are just a few years away. But Snapchat isn’t profitable, and its growth in daily users has slowed to just a few million each quarter. (Twitter’s monthly user growth, too, has slowed to the single-digit millions.)

Click here to see the latest share price for SNAP

There is a joke in Silicon Valley that Snap is Facebook’s product lead. That is, Facebook doesn’t have to think of new ideas anymore—it just has to mimic new Snapchat features and distribute them to its larger user base.

This joke is simultaneously a dig at Facebook (which has, by the quip’s logic, outsourced its creativity) and Snap (which is, by the quip’s logic, a product team that has no idea how to merchandise its ingenuity). But it’s also a genuine compliment of Snap, which, unlike Twitter, is a prodigious flood of new products and features. What’s more, Snap is poised to capture some revenue that will inevitably flow from pay-TV subscriptions, which are declining fastest among Snap’s young user base.

Snap remains a social-media behemoth that’s enviably positioned to profit from the future of video entertainment. All it has to do is convert popularity and potential to profit, in the shadow of one of the largest and best run companies in the world, one that also seems determined to destroy it.

DEREK THOMPSON is a senior editor at The Atlantic, where he writes about economics, labor markets, and the media. He is the author of the book Hit Makers.

Related gallery: 22 CEOs who changed how we live (provided by GoBankingRates)

<p>Many CEOs have changed the way their companies operate. But the most important CEOs have transformed not just their businesses, but also people's lives, including how they live, work, play and love. Perhaps Steve Jobs said it best: “The people who are crazy enough to think they can change the world are the ones who do.”</p><p>It's little surprise that Jobs, Apple’s founder and former CEO, had an almost immeasurable cultural and technological impact on people’s day-to-day lives. Similarly, other top CEOs have taken steps to leave their marks on the world.</p><p>Read on to <a href="">get advice from the business icons</a> who made their fortunes while shaping our lives.</p> 22 CEOs who changed how we live


More from The Atlantic

image beaconimage beaconimage beacon