You are using an older browser version. Please use a supported version for the best MSN experience.

News: Homepage News Stripe

R. Kelly's ex-lawyer says he was 'guilty as hell' when he defended him years ago

USA TODAY logo USA TODAY 3/8/2019 Maria Puente

R. Kelly smiling for the camera: R. Kelly mugshot photo after being arrested for unpaid child support, March 6, 2019. © Handout/ Getty Images R. Kelly mugshot photo after being arrested for unpaid child support, March 6, 2019. As if R. Kelly didn't have enough legal woes, now his ex-lawyer, who saw him through child porn charges more than a decade ago, told a Chicago newspaper columnist Friday that the R&B star was "guilty as hell."

Ed Genson, a famous Chicago defense attorney who says he's dying of cancer, might be in trouble for violating legal ethics rules, which say attorney-client privilege is sacrosanct and permanent unless the client lifts it. 

No doubt Kelly and his current lawyer would not be thrilled that his ex-defense lawyer is commenting on his guilt. 

Steve Greenberg, Kelly's current defense attorney, did not respond to an email from USA TODAY. Neither did Cook County State's Attorney Kim Foxx's office. Kelly's publicist, Darryll Johnson, said he will issue a statement later Friday. 

Meanwhile, Genson's comments sent shock waves through the Cook County legal community for seemingly betraying his former client, who now faces 10 counts of aggravated criminal sexual abuse against four women, including three who were allegedly underage at the time.

a person sitting at a table: Attorney Ed Genson in December 2008, the same year he defended R. Kelly on child-porn charges in a Chicago trial. © Seth Perlman/ AP Attorney Ed Genson in December 2008, the same year he defended R. Kelly on child-porn charges in a Chicago trial. "He definitely violated his ethical responsibilities," says Monu Bedi, a law professor at DePaul University who's been following the Kelly case. "Lawyers cannot reveal information learned during representation, especially a statement regarding a person's guilt."

"It was extraordinarily inappropriate – clearly Genson violated his professional duties to his client, and the fact that Kelly is no longer his client is completely immaterial and irrelevant," adds Chicago criminal defense attorney Andrew Stoltmann. "It's a huge breach, an electrifying turn of events."

Genson represented Kelly at least twice: When he was tried on child pornography in Cook County in 2008 and was acquitted; and when he was arrested on similar charges in 2003 in Polk County, Florida, after investigators said they found 12 photographs of a nude girl at his rental home - charges that were eventually dropped.

a man wearing a suit and tie talking on a cell phone © Provided by USA TODAY, a division of Gannett Satellite Information Network, Inc. So when Chicago Sun-Times columnist Neil Steinberg interviewed Genson in his Deerfield, Illinois, home several weeks ago, he naturally asked him about Kelly's latest sex-crimes case.   

"Any insights into R. Kelly, the man? Guilty as hell?" Steinberg asked. 

“He was guilty as hell!” Genson replied. “I don’t think he’s done anything inappropriate for years. I’ll tell you a secret: I had him go to a doctor to get shots, libido-killing shots. That’s why he didn’t get arrested for anything else.”

Steinberg held off on sharing the story because he didn't want to affect potential jurors. But after seeing Kelly's ranting, crying, screaming interview with Gayle King, "that seems no longer a concern," the reporter explained.

UP NEXT
UP NEXT

Although such a declaration is potentially grounds for disbarment, Genson had no concerns given that he's dying of bile duct cancer. 

“I can say whatever I want, but we’ve got to do it fast,” he told Steinberg. “It would be nice to get it down so somebody knows besides me.”

Now everybody who reads the Sun-Times knows about it.

"The Sun-Times is a tabloid popular in working-class white, African-American and Hispanic communities that will be the likely jury pool, so it's likely at least some of them will have read this," Stoltmann said. "The defense could use this as an example of the negative coverage against Kelly that makes it impossible to get a fair trial."

Bedi said the issue is less urgent given that Kelly is already famous so potential jurors will likely already have opinions about him.

"The key will be the judge and attorneys questioning them during the voir dire process (questioning process before trial of potential jurors) to make sure they will keep an open mind," Bedi said.

Kelly is currently in jail in Chicago for failure to pay delinquent child support to his ex-wife, and is trying to get more than $161,000 together. 

AdChoices
AdChoices

More From USA TODAY

image beaconimage beaconimage beacon