You are using an older browser version. Please use a supported version for the best MSN experience.

UTA CEO Jeremy Zimmer Explains Why Filmmakers Feel Lost and UTA Will Build Another AwesomenessTV


By Lucas Shaw

UTA CEO Jeremy Zimmer dropped by the SLS Hotel Thursday morning for the Atlantics Corner Office, a series of one-on-one interviews between the magazines journalists and top executives around the nation.

Zimmer was talking with Washington Editor-at-Large Steve Clemons about how he came to the agency and his vision for its future.

After the tale of UTAs inception — it began on a raft with Jeffrey Katzenberg and Tom Cruise — he moved through his criticism of summer blockbusters to the future of TV.

Here are five takeaways from the sitdown with Zimmer:

1. UTA Expects to Beat CAA and WME in Digital. UTA has long wanted to be known as a pioneer pushing Hollywood into digital, launching its own studio, hiring a social media agent and representing top emerging talent. While some of those efforts have not panned out — the studio, 60Frames, is now closed — the agency burnished its reputation with its incubation and guidance of AwesomenessTV.

Also read: How an '80s Sitcom Star Turned a Hollywood Mogul Into YouTubes Newest Champion

Brian Robbins blossoming online video company sold to DreamWorks Animation this spring, establishing a model for every other company in that industry. A company that didn't exist just a few years before netted $33 million upfront and should net almost $100 million in total. When Clemons asked Zimmer what percentage of the agencys portfolio came from the digital part of its business, Zimmer declined to specify. However, he said he expects his agency to create several more of those companies, noting that if they are still talking about [AwesomenessTV] a year from now weve failed.

2. Summer Blockbusters Are Like Drugs. The number of expensive, special-effects-laden movies in theaters seems to grow each year, and this summer you couldnt go two weeks without a movie where the world's future was in jeopardy. Zimmer had a simple explanation for it: those potential pieces of business art would be too strong a word — are addictive. When a movie opens to $80 or $90 million, you get hooked on doing that a lot, Zimmer said. Rather than spend boatloads of money on stars or marketing, you rely on franchises. With all the technology we now have at our disposal, using it to simulate explosions and zombies is irresistible.

Also read: USC, UTA, Kleiner Perkins Unite to Find Entrepreneurs, Keep Them in L.A.

3. The Age of "Battleship" Will Come to an End. As appealing as those tentpoles are when they work, too many of them are getting made. That has deemphasized storytelling. A lot of filmmakers feel lost, Zimmer said, arguing that Hollywood now has franchise fatigue. When asked why he believed that good storytelling would become more central to all movies, he said it was because of skepticism that every cereal box deserves to be a movie. Were not sure every studio feels that way, but well keep our fingers crossed.

4. The Future Will Look More Like Gravity. Zimmer said the remedy would be movies like Gravity, a movie that uses technology to enhance a great story and still offers an emotional experience in a theater. Sure, Gravity director Alfonso Cuaron is a UTA client, but almost everyone who has seen it says the movie is a technological marvel. Gravity is also classic Hollywood because it took five years to get made after Cuaron, the talented director of personal stories like Y Tu Mama Tambien, realized the technology he needed to make the movie didnt exist. So he had to improvise.

5. Silicon Valley Cant Yet Stomach Making Expensive Movies.Zimmer believes that Netflix and YouTube are central to the future of entertainment, defining TV as anything you watch not in a movie theater. Yet the movie theater remains a scared place. He argued it would take companies like Netflix some time to get used to spending like movie studios. They have become accustomed to dropping $200 million on a movie, splurging on production and marketing. These technology companies are just finding out how this all works.

There is another option: dont make $200 million movies.

Related stories from TheWrap:

AwesomenessTV Will Net $95M From DreamWorks Animation Deal

AwesomenessTV Launches Channel for Guys (Like Jeffrey Katzenberg Said It Would)

image beaconimage beaconimage beacon