You are using an older browser version. Please use a supported version for the best MSN experience.

The cause of the Notre Dame Cathedral fire remains unknown. Everything else is a rumor

USA TODAY logo USA TODAY 2019-04-17 N'dea Yancey-Bragg
UP NEXT
UP NEXT

As world watched the beloved Notre Dame Cathedral go up in flames Monday, conspiracy theories about how the fire started spread online.

The cause of the fire remains under investigation, but officials say it probably began as an accident during restoration work. Officials have ruled out arson as well as possible terror-related motives, but that didn’t stop misinformation and hoaxes from circulating on social media.

InfoWars, the far-right conspiracy website run by Alex Jones, published a story based on a since-deleted tweet from Christopher J. Hale claiming the fire was “deliberately” set. Hale, who describes himself as a contributor to TIME & Fox News, clarified that his initial tweet was an "unsubstantiated rumor."

Infowars writer Paul Joseph Watson included a video he tweeted that appears to show people with Arabic-sounding names reacting with 'smiley faces’ to a Facebook post about the fire.

While Watson presented this as evidence of those people “celebrating” the fire, Buzzfeed News pointed out “it's impossible to know why people chose a specific emoji, or for that matter the religion of people reacting to a Facebook video.”

Disinformation: Why is fake news so dangerous? Blame your easily-fooled brain.

Notre Dame Cathedral fire: Day after devastating Notre Dame Cathedral fire, millions in donations pour in

As the cathedral burned, a guest on Fox News seemed to suggest the blaze was set intentionally calling it “a French 9/11.” Philippe Karsenty — a French media analyst who, according to the Daily Beast, was once convicted of defamation — warned host Shepard Smith of “the story of the politically correct, the political correctness which will tell you it’s probably an accident."

Slideshow by photo services

Smith quickly shut down the interview, saying "the man on the phone with us has absolutely no information of any kind about the origin of this fire and neither do I.”

Dozens of posts on a conspiracy theory subreddit with nearly 850,000 members perpetuated the idea that the fire was started intentionally, blaming it on a variety of minority groups with little to no evidence.

Many shared a 2016 Telegraph article titled “Gas tanks and Arabic documents found in unmarked car by Paris' Notre-Dame cathedral spark terror fears,” suggesting the incident is connected to the fire. The article has since been updated to confirm that is not about the recent blaze.

Flames burn the roof of Notre-Dame Cathedral in Paris on April 15, 2019. © IAN LANGSDON, EPA-EFE Flames burn the roof of Notre-Dame Cathedral in Paris on April 15, 2019.

Misinformation has also spread from accounts claiming to be legitimate news sources. CNN reported that a fake Twitter account created in April to look like one operated by the network falsely claimed the fire was caused by terrorism.

The account was taken down within hours after CNN publicly criticized Twitter over it.

A Twitter spokesperson told the Washington Post that the company is reviewing reports of disinformation related to the blaze.

"The team is reviewing reports and if they are in violation suspending them per the Twitter Rules," the spokesperson told the Post. "Our focus continues to be detecting and removing coordinated attempts to manipulate the conversation at speed and scale."

What we know: Here's everything we know about the Notre Dame Cathedral fire

Relics saved: Notre Dame's oldest stained-glass rose windows survived; other relics moved just in time

Firefighters battle the blaze: Paris Fire Brigade chaplain braved the blaze to rescue cathedral treasures

Follow N'dea Yancey-Bragg on Twitter: @NdeaYanceyBragg

This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: The cause of the Notre Dame Cathedral fire remains unknown. Everything else is a rumor

AdChoices
AdChoices
image beaconimage beaconimage beacon