You are using an older browser version. Please use a supported version for the best MSN experience.

I was arrested for protesting against US nukes in Brussels – this is why I chose to take a stand

The Independent logo The Independent 22/02/2019 Molly Scott Cato
a group of people holding a sign posing for the camera © Provided by Independent Digital News & Media Limited

It's not every day you find yourself lying on a freezing military runway at 7 o'clock in the morning. I don’t take breaking the law lightly, so why did we decide to climb a three-metre barbed-wire fence to break into the Kleine Brogel Air Base in Belgium where the country stores US bombs?

There are 15,000 nuclear bombs still in circulation in the world and about 20 nuclear bombs are still present at the Kleine Brogel military base. The UK’s own arsenal is an estimated 215 nuclear warheads, each of which is far more deadly than the first nuclear bomb that destroyed Hiroshima.

Whilst figures will not muster much emotional response from many of us, perhaps the human cost of nuclear warfare will. This is a quote from Fujio Torikoshi, 86, who survived Hiroshima:

“I was told that I had until about age 20 to live. Yet here I am seven decades later, aged 86. All I want to do is forget, but the prominent keloid scar on my neck is a daily reminder of the atomic bomb. We cannot continue to sacrifice precious lives to warfare. All I can do is pray – earnestly, relentlessly – for world peace.”

I have been a peace activist since I joined the Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament at the age of 16 and was inspired by the Greenham Common Women’s Peace Camp which was close to my home and which I visited as a teenager. My reasons for supporting unilateral nuclear disarmament have always been consistent: I find it fundamentally unethical for any state to hold hideously destructive weapons and threaten to use them merely to reinforce their power in the world.

But even if you believe that multilateral disarmament is the best approach – as many of our politicians claim to – then you do at least need to act on that belief. The European Parliament passed a motion in October 2016 in support of the UN-sponsored Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons, which has already been signed by EU member Austria and 20 other countries, while 50 more are on their way to signing. This is multilateral disarmament in action, supported by a campaign that was rewarded with the 2017 Nobel Peace Prize. So why aren't our politicians ensuring that the UK is signed up? Why is there so little debate about the Treaty that most British people have never even heard of it?


Aside from the deeply unethical nature of a nuclear security policy, the big world powers are behind the times. The modern-day threats come from asymmetric and cyber warfare for which nuclear weapons have no relevance. With Russian attempts to destabilise our democracy and four people I represent in the South West poisoned with nerve agent by Russian agents – one of whom sadly died – it is clear that our so-called defence policy is wholly misguided. So it has never been more urgent to review our approach to defence policy. The decision by president Trump to withdraw from the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty, risking a new arms race, just adds to the urgency.

The real debate we hope to provoke through this action at the air base is about what a genuine 21st century security policy would look like. A positive contribution to this debate is already being made by Rethinking Security, a network of organisations, academics and activists working together for security based on justice, cooperation and sustainability. They are asking what really makes us safe in the world, and how we can counter the power of the arms trade to ensure that we spend as much money on peace-building as on buying weapons.

Support free-thinking journalism and subscribe to Independent Minds

The ludicrous posturing of our defence secretary Gavin Williamson, with his suggestions about establishing new military bases for Global Britain in the Caribbean and the Far East is designed to shore up his position in his own party rather than providing peace and security for the country. In a democracy it is our right to debate how our taxes are spent to ensure our safety and to underpin peace in the world.

If our action at the base this week has helped to focus attention on the real possibility of nuclear disarmament and a defence policy focusing on genuine security, then the cold and uncomfortable morning I spent there was well worth it.

Molly Scott Cato is Green MEP for the South West of England


More from The Independent

The Independent
The Independent
image beaconimage beaconimage beacon