You are using an older browser version. Please use a supported version for the best MSN experience.

F2, F3 evaluating calendar and format changes for 2022

Autosport logo Autosport 27/7/2021 Tom Howard
a group of police officers riding on the back of a truck: Dan Ticktum, Carlin, Liam Lawson, Hitech Grand Prix © Mark Sutton / Motorsport Images Dan Ticktum, Carlin, Liam Lawson, Hitech Grand Prix

Changes to the weekend format and reducing the gaps between events are at the centre of discussions regarding the look of FIA Formula 2 and FIA Formula 3 for 2022.

This season the F1 feeder categories debuted a radical format featuring fewer events but the same amount of races held per weekend in a bid to reduce the costs to teams.

F2 and F3 were split from F1 support bills at grand prix events with both championships adopting a new three-race format, featuring a divisive qualifying procedure, resulting in two reverse grid races.

While the system has reduced running costs, produced exciting races and been declared a success on track by championship boss Bruno Michel, the format is under review for next year and could result in changes.

Michel says pros and cons of the format and calendar have been identified and discussions for next year have begun with the FIA and Formula 1. A decision regarding the formats and the calendar is expected soon.

“We will look at all the pros and the cons but it is not an easy decision to make,” said Michel.

“Altogether I would say this new format works very well on the track and I’m quite happy about it, but the question is: 'Does it make real sense in terms of the calendar?'”

Two of the biggest complaints generated by the new look calendar and format have been the gap between race meetings and the complicated qualifying format.

F2’s calendar has attracted plenty of criticism for its lengthy break between events as drivers faced an eight-week wait after the Bahrain season opener for the second round in Monaco. Following the sixth round in Sochi (24-26 September), there will be a 10-week gap before the next event in Saudi Arabia (3-5 December).

a motorcycle is parked on the side of a road: Guanyu Zhou, Uni-Virtuosi Racing leads Felipe Drugovich, Uni-Virtuosi at the start of the race © Autosport.com Guanyu Zhou, Uni-Virtuosi Racing leads Felipe Drugovich, Uni-Virtuosi at the start of the race

Guanyu Zhou, Uni-Virtuosi Racing leads Felipe Drugovich, Uni-Virtuosi at the start of the race

Photo by: Zak Mauger / Motorsport Images

The large gap between events has made the complicated qualifying format harder to grasp for fans, with regular explanations required.

The results of qualifying set the grid for Sunday’s third race, while the top 10 in F2 and top 12 in F3 are reversed to form the grid for the opening sprint race. The results from that race are reversed in the same way to form the grid for the second sprint.

"If we look objectively at the situation, I would say that number one there is too much time in between events and that is something that we understand and the feedback from fans it is quite obvious,” said Michel when outlining the negatives of the system under evaluation.

“It is more difficult to get involved into a championship when you have one month and even two months between events. When we went to Silverstone, everybody forgot about Baku - that is the problem. That is something that we really carefully need to look at because we don’t want to lose fans because of that.

“The second thing we can say is the format is a little bit complicated to understand, and we need to explain it and explain it again. The fact that we have races every month and month and a half doesn’t help [fans] to understand the format.

“One thing people have been saying is they would like to have F3 and F2 together with F1 on the same weekend. It is good, but it doesn’t allow us to support F1 as much as we would like to, as we cannot do too many races.

“The last thing, and for F3 it is okay, but for F2 a three-race weekend is very heavy work for the teams.”

However, Michel was quick to outline the benefits of the new system, which has seen Formula 3 increase its visibility now it has a larger platform at F1 events, while fewer events has saved the teams money.

a motorcycle is parked on the side of a road: Dennis Hauger, Prema Racing, Jack Doohan, Trident © Autosport.com Dennis Hauger, Prema Racing, Jack Doohan, Trident

Dennis Hauger, Prema Racing, Jack Doohan, Trident

Photo by: Mark Sutton / Motorsport Images

“We have decreased the costs for the teams for sure because we have less events, so that is quite simple,” he said.

“The logistic costs are becoming less, but it doesn’t mean all the costs are decreased because all the teams have to support heavy costs for the protocols around the pandemic.

“We have increased the number of F1 events where we can support the race through F2 and F3, now that the two are separated.

“Definitely we have massively increased the visibility of Formula 3 with F3 being the only support race with F1 at some events. It is a massive difference.

“We have increased the figures for Formula 2 generally speaking, the TV, social media, so all this is very important.

“The sporting objective that we had are altogether being met, which means we have exciting races. We have mid-grid drivers that can have interesting results on Saturday and that is something very important for our category.

“We have the feature race on Sunday which I have wanted for quite a long time and I think it is strong positioning, so it's been working.”

UP NEXT
UP NEXT

View the full site

image beaconimage beaconimage beacon