You are using an older browser version. Please use a supported version for the best MSN experience.

Everyone was wrong about ivermectin

Washington Examiner logo Washington Examiner 11/18/2021 Kaylee McGhee White
© Provided by Washington Examiner

Health officials condemned ivermectin as a useless and even dangerous treatment for COVID-19. The media smeared the well-known and commonly-used anti-parasitic drug as “horse dewormer” even though it was always a human medicine as well. They mercilessly mocked people who thought this drug might help them.

But it turns out ivermectin actually can help certain people fight off COVID-19, according to science writer Scott Alexander.

In a lengthy blog post, Alexander took a deep dive into all of the available studies on ivermectin and whether it works against COVID-19. It’s worth reading in full, but I’ll highlight his main point: ivermectin does work, albeit indirectly, especially in areas where parasitic and intestinal worms are common.

There’s a reason the most impressive ivermectin studies came from parts of the world where worms are prevalent, he says. Parasites suppress the immune system, making it more difficult for the human body to fight off viruses. Thus, getting rid of worm infections makes it easier for COVID-19 patients to bounce back from the virus.

If Alexander’s hypothesis is correct, then he’s also right that everyone who hastily jumped to a conclusion about ivermectin was wrong. Ivermectin is not the COVID-19 cure that some made it out to be, but it’s also not useless in the fight against COVID-19 either. It does have some benefits — they’re just minimal and far less effective than other therapeutics, such as monoclonal antibody treatments.

“Experts” deserve much of the blame for ivermectin disinformation. Most of them refused even to entertain the possibility that ivermectin might help COVID-19 patients. I’d be surprised if even one official in the Food and Drug Administration or Centers for Disease Control and Prevention took the time to evaluate the data like Alexander did before declaring publicly that it didn’t work.

It is also worth considering why so many people convinced themselves that ivermectin was a COVID-19 super-drug. Alexander argues that ivermectin fanaticism is connected to anti-vax sentiment, in the sense that both are wacky pseudoscience beliefs to which certain people are attracted.

But there’s a much simpler explanation: Many of the same people who were drawn to Ivermectin are wary of the COVID-19 vaccines because they are skeptical of the public health consensus in general. They see health officials stressing and in some cases mandating vaccination and are repelled by this. They see health officials rejecting ivermectin and other COVID-19 treatments as nonsense and are drawn to them. Their beliefs aren’t so much an embrace of pseudoscience as they are a flat rejection of an authority that has failed them.

Alexander gets at this point here:

In a world where scientists seemed like hostile aliens, I would hesitate to take the vaccine. Again, ivermectin optimism isn’t exactly like vaccine denialism - it’s a less open-and-shut question, you can still make a plausible argument for it. But it’s some of the same people and follows the same dynamics. If we want to make people more willing to get vaccines, or less willing to take ivermectin, we have to make the scientific establishment feel less like an enclave of hostile aliens to half the population.

The problem with this is much of the scientific establishment seems to want to come across as, to borrow Alexander’s phrase, hostile aliens. They don’t care whether the public trusts their guidance or not. If they did, it would not have taken a science blogger to get to the bottom of what was happening with ivermectin. The CDC and FDA — the people who literally get paid to research these kinds of things — should have done that months ago.


Washington Examiner Videos

Replay Video

Tags: Beltway Confidential, Opinion, Coronavirus, Public Health, Science, Data

Original Author: Kaylee McGhee White

Original Location: Everyone was wrong about ivermectin


More from Washington Examiner

Washington Examiner
Washington Examiner
image beaconimage beaconimage beacon