You are using an older browser version. Please use a supported version for the best MSN experience.

Google Must Disclose Emails in Russian Oligarch’s Divorce

Bloomberg logoBloomberg 11/25/2020 Joel Rosenblatt
a woman wearing sunglasses posing for the camera: Russian housewife Tatiana Akhmedova who was awarded £453 million by a judge after her marriage to billionaire businessman Farkhad Akhmedov broke down, leaves a hearing at the Old Bailey in London, where the High Court is sitting. © Photographer: David Mirzoeff - PA Images/PA Images Russian housewife Tatiana Akhmedova who was awarded £453 million by a judge after her marriage to billionaire businessman Farkhad Akhmedov broke down, leaves a hearing at the Old Bailey in London, where the High Court is sitting.

(Bloomberg) -- Google was ordered by a U.S. judge to turn over the content of emails of the son of Farkhad Akhmedov to the Russian oligarch’s former wife in her pursuit of a 450 million-pound ($601 million) divorce judgment.

The skirmish over the email accounts is part of one of London’s largest divorce fights -- involving a super yacht in Dubai and litigation funder Burford Capital Ltd. -- which landed before a judge in San Jose, California, in the federal court closest to Google’s Mountain View headquarters 14 miles away.

Tatiana Akhmedova alleges that her former husband transferred assets to their son Temur to avoid paying a London court’s judgment that she says remains “almost entirely unsatisfied.”

U.S. Magistrate Judge Virginia M. DeMarchi said she was inclined to comply with the London court’s ruling allowing Akhmedova to seek her son’s emails from Google. The judge said the information released should not go beyond the requirements of the litigation in London.

The information from the emails will be used to learn whether Temur assisted his father in the fraudulent transfer of assets, and if so, to win a judgment against him, Tatiana Akhmedova said in a filing.

DeMarchi’s ruling follows a search of Temur’s apartment by his mother’s legal team that was authorized by a London judge who has accused the son, a financier, of destroying evidence, according to a report in the Times of London.

A representative of Temur Akhmedov said the U.S. suit was an attempt “to find ‘evidence’ against him which simply does not exist.”

“As a result of this latest Google hearing, Temur hopes his mother and her backers will enjoy reading the contents of his old high school email account,” the representative said in an emailed statement.

Google argued that it is forbidden under U.S. law from disclosing contents of a communication without an account user’s “express consent.”

Julie E. Schwartz, a lawyer for Google, told DeMarchi that Google faces legal liability for improperly disclosing the information. “This has broader implications than just this case here today,” she added.

Read More: Oligarch’s Super yacht Freed in Blow to Burford Divorce Case

In her order, DeMarchi wrote that Temur Akhmedov’s “generally uncooperative behavior” in the British litigation proceeding doesn’t have any bearing on her decision, which instead turns on whether the accounts are his and whether he agreed to Google turning over the information they contain.

“Google points to no evidence suggesting that Mr. Akhmedov is not the owner of the accounts, and he has clearly and expressly consented to production of their contents,” DeMarchi wrote.

Albert Gidari of Stanford University’s Center for Internet and Society said the judge probably didn’t want to hold up a trial set for Nov. 30 in London.

“No one should read this decision as open season on compelled disclosure of user content in discovery proceedings,” Gidari said in an email. “To the contrary, the case stands for the unremarkable proposition that if a party can prove ownership of an account, and show discovery from the user can’t be had through other means, the party can obtain provider assistance through court proceedings.”

Google didn’t respond to a request for comment about the ruling.

The case is In Re Ex Parte Application of Tatiana Akhmedova, 20-mc-80156, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California (San Jose).

(Updates with comment from Akhmedov in seventh, eighth paragraphs. A previous version of the story corrected the currency of the judgment.)

For more articles like this, please visit us at bloomberg.com

©2020 Bloomberg L.P.

AdChoices
AdChoices
image beaconimage beaconimage beacon