‘Based on evidence’: Gwyneth Paltrow juror says Goop mogul didn’t win because she’s a celebrity
A juror in the Gwyneth Paltrow ski crash trial has said that the jury didn’t side with the Goop mogul because she’s famous but that the decision was based on the “evidence”.
Samantha Imrie served as juror 11 during the trial, telling Good Morning America that the testimony of snow science expert Dr Irving Scher swayed the jury.
He argued that Ms Paltrow’s story of what happened on the slopes of the Deer Valley Resort in 2016 is “consistent with the laws of physics” while the version of events put forward by retired eye doctor Terry Sanderson, 76, didn’t add up.
The court ruled that Mr Sanderson would pay Ms Paltrow $1 following the trial prompted by a 2019 lawsuit. Mr Sanderson had initially sought more than $3m in damages, which had been downgraded to $300,000 by Judge Kent Holmberg. Ms Paltrow also asked that her legal fees be covered.
-
Terrified guests at Disneyland Tokyo take cover amid 6.2-magnitude earthquake Attendees at Disneyland Tokyo crouched down as a 6.2-magnitude earthquake hit the Japanese capital on Friday 26 May.Source: @Lahti_696 via Spectee /TMX
The Independent
-
Touching moment 11-year-old US cancer patient meets British donor who saved his life A US cancer patient met the British man who saved his lifePA
The Independent
-
Carol Vorderman compares Boris Johnson to 'diarrhoea' on Have I Got News For You Carol Vorderman compares Boris Johnson to 'diarrhoea' on Have I Got News For YouHave I Got News For You, BBC
The Independent
“He is a snow sports expert, in many different ways. I think the fact that Dr Scher specifically studied snow science, it had a stronger opinion,” Ms Imrie, 31, told ABC.
“The whole thing was a little shocking to me. We did have a unanimous decision. I think it’s important the public doesn’t just think this was a win because Gwyneth is a celebrity,” she added.
“It’s based on the evidence and the law. I do work in medicine and have to look at everyone the same. So I think that should apply in the courtroom, as well,” she said.
Mr Sanderson argued that the 2016 crash, which he says was caused by Ms Paltrow, had left him with severe injuries, but photos were shown during the trial of him travelling all over the world.
“I think I wrote down, ‘Wow, I need to make more money so I can travel this way,’” Ms Imrie told GMA.
“I wouldn’t have thought he was capable of those things based on the picture that had been painted,” she added.
“He was telling his truth, and I think unfortunately some of that has been distorted due to some other factors,” she said. “But I do think that he did not intend to tell a truth that wasn’t his truth.”
“In the back of my mind, yes, this woman is an actress, and I took that into account, but I didn’t feel that she had a reason to lie under oath,” the juror told the programme. “She’s always in the spotlight, so she always has to be honest.”
From news to politics, travel to sport, culture to climate – The Independent has a host of free newsletters to suit your interests. To find the stories you want to read, and more, in your inbox, click here.
More from The Independent
-
Search for missing woman who vanished on cross-country roadtrip with her boyfriend sparks Gabby Petito comparisons
The Independent
-
Hollywood Vampires postpone US tour dates after Johnny Depp suffers ‘painful injury’
The Independent
-
Twilight star Rachelle Lefevre says she won’t bring her non-binary child to Target after Pride merch removed
The Independent