You are using an older browser version. Please use a supported version for the best MSN experience.

A new nuclear weapons delivery system is the last thing the US needs

The Hill logo The Hill 11/21/2022 Yint Hmu, opinion contributor
© Provided by The Hill

As conditions for Russian soldiers deteriorate on the battlefields of Ukraine, we have seen a rhetorical escalation of threats of a nuclear strike from Moscow in response. The risk of a possible nuclear conflict has not been this high since the height of the Cold War decades ago. 

At this moment, we should be doubling down on our efforts toward nuclear arms control. Instead, the United States Congress is trying to develop a new nuclear weapons delivery system we don’t need, and one the Biden administration has emphatically declared it doesn’t want. 

Congress’s pet nuclear boondoggle is known as the nuclear-armed sea-launched cruise missile (SLCM-N). It’s a Cold War-era idea that was given new life by former president Donald Trump only to haunt us in the year 2022. Nuke-happy, hawkish Democrats teamed up with the GOP and managed to slip $45 million for SLCM-N research and development into this year’s defense budget  the FY23 National Defense Authorization Act, a bill that is now being debated. 

If completed, SLCM-N would essentially do what its name suggests: deliver nuclear warheads from ships, submarines or naval aircraft on a trajectory that makes it hard to track by radar. 

Weapons like the SLCM-N are inherently more dangerous because of their ambiguous nature. These weapons look pretty much like conventional missiles, which are carried by U.S. naval assets around the world. Neither our allies nor our adversaries will be able to tell whether any random ship or submarine is armed with a nuclear weapon. And whenever a ship or a submarine fires a missile, everyone will be left wondering if it’s a nuke or not. The risk of accidental nuclear conflict is exponentially higher with these weapons in play. And they’re not treaty-limited either, which further destabilizes the environment. 

Members of Congress, nuclear non-proliferation groups and anti-war organizations have called for the elimination of the SLCM-N. The Biden administration has also strongly opposed its funding in the NDAA. And in the recently released Nuclear Posture Review, the administration laid out multiple reasons to scrap the SLCM-N program entirely, ranging from the cost of the program to its redundancy with already existing weapon systems.

Still, the SLCM-N is on track to receive its funding. The provision to fund the research and development of the program passed the House, and right now it’s in the Senate as part of the NDAA. But it’s not a done deal yet, and there’s still time for the Biden administration and Senate Democrats to eliminate the program. 

President Biden and the Democrats are riding high right now after a stalwart midterm performance that proved the pundits and the polls wrong and generally exceeded all expectations. This kind of gravity-defying electoral performance grants a grace period to push for whatever you want. But whether the administration and Senate Democrats use this moment to fight to eliminate this nuclear weapons program they do not want, or need, is another story. 

In the small window of time that’s left before the end of the legislative calendar, the Biden administration and Senate Democrats should spend political capital, advocate steadfastly for what they believe in and fight to remove this costly, redundant nuclear weapons program from the NDAA. It is more harmful to give in right now without fighting for their position. If funding for the SLCM-N goes unchallenged, it risks becoming yet another status quo multimillion-dollar weapons program in the perpetually ballooning Pentagon budget. 

At a time when the world is rightly terrified of tactical nuclear weapon use by Russia, it’s unacceptable for Congress to go rogue and pursue the development of SLCM-N. The Biden administration needs all the credibility it can get to reduce nuclear risk in Ukraine. Congress pursuing a new tactical nuclear delivery system — a destabilizing move at any time — is especially counterproductive now. It’s time for Democrats to step up and end SLCM-N once and for all.

Yint Hmu is a senior associate for digital campaigns at Win Without War. You can follow him on Twitter @yinth_.

For the latest news, weather, sports, and streaming video, head to The Hill.


More from The Hill

image beaconimage beaconimage beacon