Justice Thomas ignores basic ethics where wife's activism, lobbying conflict with cases
Jane Mayer, chief Washington correspondent for the New Yorker, talks about her new reporting on the activism and paid affiliations and lobbying of Ginni Thomas, wife of Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, that Justice Thomas does not acknowledge conflict with cases before the Supreme Court from which he should recuse himself.
UP NEXT
UP NEXT
-
How Democrats can win big on abortion rights
MSNBC
-
Inside the 'Tucker Carlson Syndrome' infecting American minds
MSNBC
-
Trump allies Thomas Barrack and Steve Wynn in legal trouble
MSNBC
-
Republicans focus on political theater instead of solutions to solve the nation’s baby formula shortage
MSNBC
-
Madison Cawthorn loses primary battle
MSNBC
-
The January 6th Committee has key new evidence ahead of their public hearings
MSNBC
-
U.S. hospitals in unending crisis mode since start of pandemic
MSNBC
-
Trump turns to Georgia to gain control of election process
MSNBC
-
U.S. Soccer Reaches historic equal pay agreement
MSNBC
-
The dangers of spreading the racist 'replacement theory'
MSNBC
-
Rep. Cicilline on Ginni Thomas emails: ‘Very, very disturbing’
MSNBC
-
Amnesty International Secretary General says overturning Roe will have global impact
MSNBC
-
Progressive candidates secure primary wins despite dark money group spending
MSNBC
-
Amnesty International Secretary General says overturning Roe will have global impact
MSNBC
-
The Right’s white violence problem
MSNBC
-
The most restrictive abortion law in the country.
MSNBC