You are using an older browser version. Please use a supported version for the best MSN experience.

What are economic sanctions, and how did they become Washington’s foreign policy tool of choice?

The Washington Post logo The Washington Post 4/15/2021 Miriam Berger
a person holding a sign: An Iranian youth in Tehran shows on his phone a statement declaring that the website of Iran's Arabic-language channel Al-Alam “has been seized by the United States Government” on June 23. © AFP/Getty Images An Iranian youth in Tehran shows on his phone a statement declaring that the website of Iran's Arabic-language channel Al-Alam “has been seized by the United States Government” on June 23.

The Biden administration said Thursday that it would impose new sanctions on Cuba amid rising pressure for the administration to act in response to the country’s crackdown on recent protests.

At the start of his term, Biden signaled he would chart a somewhat different course on Cuba from that of former president Donald Trump, who ramped up restrictions on the island.

At the same time, Biden’s use of sanctions comes as little surprise: From Russia to Myanmar, economic sanctions have become a favored tool in Washington.

They drove debates in early April when Iran and the United States met separately with European counterparts to discuss reviving the 2015 nuclear deal — including the repeal of U.S. sanctions. In just the past few months, the Biden administration has also reinstated sanctions against Myanmar for human rights violations, targeted Russia for its jailing of opposition figure Alexei Navalny and cyberespionage campaign, and imposed sanctions on Chinese officials for the erosion of democracy in Hong Kong.

Here’s what to know about the evolution of U.S. sanctions.

Biden administration imposes sanctions on Cuban officials following attacks on protesters

What are economic sanctions?

Sanctions can be broad, such as the Cuba embargo, or targeted, an approach widely favored in recent decades. When the United States issues sanctions against a person or entity, Americans and U.S. companies are barred from transacting with it. In some cases, sanctions go even further, forbidding Americans from doing business with third parties in business with the target.

Sanctions can limit an array of economic and trade opportunities. They often include frozen travel visas and bank accounts. They can be issued against individuals, banks, institutions, governments and other entities, such as ships.

As sanctions have risen in foreign policy prominence, so has criticism of their effectiveness — and concern over their impact on civilian populations.

How Cuba’s compounding woes have fueled discontent

Why have they become popular in Washington?

Both the U.S. president and Congress have the power to issue sanctions. The International Emergency Economic Powers Act of 1977 allows a president to do so with relative ease.

As a high degree of world trade relies on U.S. dollars and flows through U.S.-based financial institutions, Washington is uniquely positioned to wield sanctions and impose “an enormous amount of economic pain” by restricting access to global markets, said Ali Vaez, director of the Iran Project at the Washington office of the International Crisis Group.

Biden administration imposes significant economic sanctions on Russia over cyberspying, efforts to influence presidential election

What are the latest sanctions on Cuban officials?

In a statement Thursday, the White House announced “new sanctions targeting elements of the Cuban regime responsible for this crackdown — the head of the Cuban military and the division of the Cuban Ministry of the Interior driving the crackdown — to hold them accountable for their actions.”

“This is just the beginning — the United States will continue to sanction individuals responsible for oppression of the Cuban people,” the statement continued.

The sanctions were imposed under the Global Magnitsky Act, through which the United States can sanction foreign governments and individuals for human rights abuses.

Although President Barack Obama moved to reboot relations between the United States and Cuba when he reestablished diplomatic ties with Havana in 2015, Trump tightened many economic, trade and travel restrictions.

Video: What Are Sanctions And Why U.S. Uses Them? (Newsweek)


What about recent sanctions on Russia?

In mid-April, Washington took steps to restrict U.S. financial institutions from buying a range of Russian government bonds, target Russian cyberhacking companies, expel Russian intelligence officers in the United States, and include an option to broaden the range of measures further.

These were added to a wide range of sanctions already in place, which began to ratchet up under the Obama administration, in response to the 2014 Russian invasion of Crimea. During his term in office, Trump imposed more than 40 rounds of sanctions on Russia, according to the Carnegie Moscow Center.

How have U.S. sanctions evolved?

In recent decades, sanctions have transformed from “old-style, countrywide embargoes,” such as those against apartheid South Africa, to “targeted” ones focused on individual actors, said John E. Smith, former director of the U.S. Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control, which enforces trade and economic sanctions.

This shift began following the 9/11 attacks, when Washington started to focus on international financing in counterterrorism efforts, said Brian O’Toole, a nonresident senior fellow at the Washington-based Atlantic Council’s GeoEconomics Center.

Those efforts benefited from the United States’ growing dominance in international finance, which along with technical and legal changes made it difficult to “move money around the world without interacting with the United States,” said O’Toole.

Over the past decade, the United States has also begun to rely on secondary or extraterritorial sanctions, which penalize third parties that conduct business with a designee, effectively forcing others to adhere to U.S. policies.

What was Trump’s approach to sanctions?

Trump, who favored unilateral presidential action, imposed a range of economic sanctions, hitting adversaries while also threatening the interests of some allies. His targets ranged from Iran to the International Criminal Court and beyond.

While the Trump administration cut funding to many agencies, including the State Department, it increased the budget of the Treasury Department, which oversees sanctions.

Julia Friedlander, a senior fellow at the Atlantic Council who worked on sanctions policies at the U.S. Treasury under Obama and Trump, said that the “chaos” that defined Trump’s “very disaggregated policymaking process” helped make sanctions a go-to alternative.

How might Biden differ?

In contrast to Trump, Smith, the former OFAC director, said he expects Biden to take a much more multilateral approach to sanctions and rely on them less frequently than Trump did.

“The Biden administration, like other administrations before it, will be very concerned about trying to coordinate as much as possible their sanctions approach” with other countries, he said. “The more multilateral the sanctions, the more effective it will be.”

One day after his inauguration, Biden signed a flurry of executive orders, including one that called for an evaluation of the impact of U.S. sanctions on global responses to the coronavirus pandemic.

The United States is trying to salvage the Iran deal. Here’s how both countries have broken with the pact.

What are some key countries to watch?

For U.S. policy toward Venezuela and North Korea, where Trump engaged more multilaterally, analysts said they expected Biden to continue to rely on sanctions.

Biden is expected to take a more adversarial approach to Russia than did Trump, who angered many in Washington with his affinity for Russian President Vladimir Putin. It was Congress that ultimately passed sanctions related to Russian interference in the 2016 U.S. election and curbed the president’s power to repeal them.

After Trump withdrew from the Iran nuclear deal in 2018, he reissued a range of sanctions against Iran. Before leaving office, he added new sanctions and targets to the growing list, complicating Biden’s stated goal of reentering the agreement.

Iran has said it is also ready to return to the deal — if Washington were to repeal all Trump-issued sanctions. The sticking point, said Vaez, is that some of those sanctions are not in direct violation of the 2015 deal but are now a major chokehold for Iran.

What sanctions reforms are under discussion in Washington?

Some experts and advocates want a fundamental overhaul of how U.S. sanctions are deployed.

Vaez said that in practice, U.S. sanctions have rarely achieved their stated foreign policy goals.

This is in part because Washington has no clear framework for evaluating the effectiveness of sanctions and whether the foreign policy aims were achieved, he said. It also does not have a mechanism for following through on the promise of sanctions relief if the target does indeed change its behavior.

“Sanctions are only as effective as the prospect of relieving them in response to policy changes,” Vaez said.

Instead, OFAC, the agency charged with devising and enforcing sanctions, is “a wheel that only moves in one direction,” said Vaez. “It does not have the mandate to make sure that once the sanctions are limited that the target country can normalize relations with the outside world.”

Vaez said Congress could play a role by enacting legislation that sets out clear criteria for sanctions removal and relief.

Human rights groups say U.S. sanctions in countries including Iraq, Iran and Venezuela have exacerbated humanitarian crises by cutting off civilians from vital economic activities, creating shortages of basics such as medicines. While OFAC issues sanctions waivers for humanitarian goods, in practice banks and companies are hesitant to transact with a sanctioned individual or entity because they fear violating broad U.S. regulations.

Some Democrats in Congress have been pushing for legislation to ensure humanitarian exemptions are in place for Iran during the pandemic.


More from The Washington Post

The Washington Post
The Washington Post
image beaconimage beaconimage beacon